{
  "productSlug": "witan-batch-1787098836366-483713",
  "productDisplayName": "witan-batch-1787098836366-483713",
  "repo": {
    "headSha": "f59e929c999e8b2efc7b12fd0bc1685c1a186be3"
  },
  "rubricVersion": "witan-rubric-v17-2026-07-24",
  "criteria": [
    {
      "id": "A1",
      "title": "Test integrity and regression signal",
      "category": "code_trust",
      "score": 2.8,
      "status": "verified",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/__init__.py"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/__init__.py"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/complete_schema.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "67fbb9f86ee1c9676adb45cba106aea8b87862c465b76190d27fddf624dcd76b"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/nested_schema.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "5dd7f39830dbd07102bb9ee66166b21a94263f8b0654506ded8ce415eb29ee8e"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/test_complete_benchmark.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "93af73fdd79c627048ac1cd754a6d7e8c743db57c9cb099cea6092a5a0fbc796"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/test_micro_benchmarks.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "4a88116cb64c3477029a5da675cef2ef1cacb5ecba96b0c9d959281b5ba7a74c"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/test_nested_benchmark.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b257d008f043315975815e7de60724a782db73b65b557fc9bd9f4541b82118bf"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Detected test file",
          "path": "pydantic-core/tests/benchmarks/test_serialization_micro.py",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "52fce052ee0680ca58612ce06db7ae71a2130e831c43136e5435005b24695ab6"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Configured test runner",
          "path": "Makefile",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "0e9d9400ee8074b82f885b9b93d02183130e878644be5671efc565a992b0b39f"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Configured test runner",
          "path": "pydantic-core/Makefile",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "4ac502de0f82b2a56fb9496504417004f18568ac01c2f804355a38447e57e9fa"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Configured test runner",
          "path": "pydantic-core/pyproject.toml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "99dd772c656a64b39902ded5f1977f951a4ce8a0cc599aa0a68cf02e167153ab"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "Configured test runner",
          "path": "pyproject.toml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "8375abce73bfeab0ffd54df6934079380acab1fe0aac515b211c8f307cb53782"
        },
        {
          "kind": "coverage",
          "label": "Coverage configuration",
          "path": ".github/workflows/coverage.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "778ab27e94bf17c3231a259cb6e871934f45466bdd78f7bba34fbee2d8391c55"
        },
        {
          "kind": "coverage",
          "label": "Coverage configuration",
          "path": "pydantic-core/pyproject.toml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "99dd772c656a64b39902ded5f1977f951a4ce8a0cc599aa0a68cf02e167153ab"
        },
        {
          "kind": "coverage",
          "label": "Coverage configuration",
          "path": "pyproject.toml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "8375abce73bfeab0ffd54df6934079380acab1fe0aac515b211c8f307cb53782"
        },
        {
          "kind": "test_run",
          "label": "CI workflow runs the test suite",
          "path": ".github/workflows/ci.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b84e54ec0671538f0b03ba7abef91397863c968f0523fb91f16cf491971b1936"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "test_to_source_ratio",
          "label": "Test-to-source file ratio",
          "value": 292,
          "max": 125,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.3,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Measures how much concrete test surface exists relative to implementation surface."
        },
        {
          "name": "coverage_percent",
          "label": "Static coverage percentage",
          "value": 0,
          "max": 100,
          "weight": 0.3,
          "unit": "percent",
          "description": "Uses a static coverage report value or configured threshold when present, without running tests."
        },
        {
          "name": "verification_script_ratio",
          "label": "Verification script ratio",
          "value": 6,
          "max": 4,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.25,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Measures explicit test/lint/typecheck verification commands (via npm script or CI-invoked tool) plus test runner configuration."
        },
        {
          "name": "non_hollow_test_share",
          "label": "Non-hollow test share",
          "value": 213,
          "max": 225,
          "weight": 0.15,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Penalizes skipped or placeholder-only test files; test-directory support scaffolding (helpers/fixtures with no test in them) is excluded from the denominator."
        }
      ],
      "notes": "A1 is detected from real test files, test runner configuration, and optional coverage configuration."
    },
    {
      "id": "A2",
      "title": "Data-layer isolation and secrets posture",
      "category": "code_trust",
      "score": 0,
      "status": "not_applicable",
      "evidence": [],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [],
      "notes": "No data layer (DB/ORM/migrations) or ratable secrets surface detected — A2 not applicable to this repo archetype. A ratable surface requires .env* files, .gitignore .env rule, committed/history .env path, or detected signing/HMAC/secret-comparison code; bare env reads (process.env / os.environ / std::env::) do not qualify."
    },
    {
      "id": "A3",
      "title": "Production readiness",
      "category": "code_trust",
      "score": 0,
      "status": "not_applicable",
      "evidence": [],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [],
      "notes": "No deployable-service surface detected — production-readiness not applicable to this library/CLI archetype. Signals checked: production server entrypoint (HTTP/RPC port binding in main/server/app files, outside examples/tests/demo dirs), deploy config (vercel.json, render.yaml, fly.toml, Procfile, app.yaml, serverless.yml, docker-compose, k8s/helm manifests), CI deploy job (fly deploy, kubectl apply, helm install/upgrade, docker push). A Dockerfile without an explicit runtime start/service command is ambiguous and does not qualify."
    },
    {
      "id": "A4",
      "title": "Dependency hygiene",
      "category": "code_trust",
      "score": 3.6,
      "status": "verified",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "dependency_report",
          "label": "Dependency manifest",
          "path": "pydantic-core/Cargo.toml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "e0dfda4bea748179e04d089b767064d26c9a2696f48c32daf41442d172f597fe"
        },
        {
          "kind": "dependency_report",
          "label": "Dependency lockfile",
          "path": "pydantic-core/Cargo.lock",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "79e859286a1b89d1369b5469c061e69f06b61cbdab33b79d9891df4219c88437"
        },
        {
          "kind": "dependency_report",
          "label": "Dependency update config",
          "path": ".github/dependabot.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "62040a26dfecda3a6be7f9834c6e1892da3cdb02e50bdc315ed57d2619127722"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "declared_version_range_ratio",
          "label": "Declared version range ratio",
          "value": 28,
          "max": 28,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Measures dependencies declared with an explicit version constraint (range or exact); a library correctly ships ranges, so ranges earn full credit here."
        },
        {
          "name": "lockfile_coverage",
          "label": "Lockfile coverage",
          "value": 1,
          "max": 1,
          "weight": 0.3,
          "unit": "present",
          "description": "Credited when present (reproducible dev/CI installs); a library without a committed lockfile is not penalized — consumers resolve their own trees."
        },
        {
          "name": "dependency_automation_ratio",
          "label": "Dependency automation ratio",
          "value": 1,
          "max": 2,
          "weight": 0.25,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Credits automated dependency updates and package-manager audit hooks."
        },
        {
          "name": "dependency_count_sanity",
          "label": "Dependency count sanity",
          "value": 1,
          "max": 1,
          "weight": 0.1,
          "unit": "sane",
          "description": "Credits a sane direct-dependency count for a library (full credit up to 120 declared specs across manifests, declining beyond)."
        }
      ],
      "notes": "A4 scored against library/CLI norms (no deploy surface detected — same archetype line as A3): declared version ranges are correct library behavior; a committed lockfile is credited but not required."
    },
    {
      "id": "A5",
      "title": "Claim-vs-reality reconciliation",
      "category": "code_trust",
      "score": 2.4,
      "status": "warning",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "claim_reconciliation",
          "label": "Repository claim source",
          "path": "README.md",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b5e7970366d994018b9add19d4eae4b75e6830cde25d279aa3e1907ed8970c6b"
        },
        {
          "kind": "artifact",
          "label": "Code presence for claim reconciliation",
          "path": "pydantic-core/src/argument_markers.rs",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "71fe74ddc7fe2a0b9507f36b40cf3a18d80dd1805469c33ff86bbddfadf58e99"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [
        {
          "severity": "warning",
          "summary": "Claim source and implementation files are present, but no dedicated claim-reality report artifact was supplied.",
          "evidence": {
            "kind": "claim_reconciliation",
            "label": "Repository claim source",
            "path": "README.md",
            "line": 1,
            "contentHash": "b5e7970366d994018b9add19d4eae4b75e6830cde25d279aa3e1907ed8970c6b"
          }
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "claim_match_rate",
          "label": "Claim match rate",
          "value": 12,
          "max": 20,
          "weight": 0.5,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Uses bounded implementation-to-claim-source depth as a static proxy when no dedicated artifact exists."
        },
        {
          "name": "claim_source_depth",
          "label": "Claim source depth",
          "value": 9,
          "max": 4,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.35,
          "unit": "docs",
          "description": "Credits multiple claim-bearing documents without judging unverified prose as truth."
        },
        {
          "name": "reconciliation_artifact_depth",
          "label": "Reconciliation artifact depth",
          "value": 0,
          "max": 3,
          "weight": 0.15,
          "unit": "artifacts",
          "description": "Requires a specific claim-reality artifact to reach full depth."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B1",
      "title": "Internal process dimension",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 0,
      "status": "not_applicable",
      "evidence": [],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [],
      "notes": "Substrate-specific: an internal process dimension is not applicable to external code."
    },
    {
      "id": "B2",
      "title": "PR outcome traceability",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 4,
      "status": "verified",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "ci_run",
          "label": "Pull-request CI workflow",
          "path": ".github/workflows/ci.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b84e54ec0671538f0b03ba7abef91397863c968f0523fb91f16cf491971b1936"
        },
        {
          "kind": "ci_run",
          "label": "Pull-request CI workflow",
          "path": ".github/workflows/codspeed.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b2580cad48fe8cb8b58e075c9bdb25801e721dc6fe2c565020528a895976676d"
        },
        {
          "kind": "ci_run",
          "label": "Pull-request CI workflow",
          "path": ".github/workflows/coverage.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "778ab27e94bf17c3231a259cb6e871934f45466bdd78f7bba34fbee2d8391c55"
        },
        {
          "kind": "pull_request",
          "label": "Pull request template",
          "path": ".github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "1fd33fa8826bc1c97dd8c56105e3cf2511486de22d45fb8890a738a5f5197d82"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "pr_trace_primitives",
          "label": "PR trace basic checks",
          "value": 11,
          "max": 2,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.8,
          "unit": "signals",
          "description": "Measures CI, PR template, and review-gate evidence for pull-request traceability."
        },
        {
          "name": "pr_merge_ratio",
          "label": "Recent PR merge ratio",
          "value": 1,
          "max": 1,
          "weight": 0.2,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Uses bounded git history as a deterministic proxy for PR outcome traceability."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B3",
      "title": "CI and QA discipline",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 3.6,
      "status": "verified",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "ci_run",
          "label": "CI workflow",
          "path": ".github/workflows/ci.yml",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "b84e54ec0671538f0b03ba7abef91397863c968f0523fb91f16cf491971b1936"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "ci_script_depth",
          "label": "CI verification depth",
          "value": 3,
          "max": 4,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.45,
          "unit": "signals",
          "description": "Counts npm verification scripts plus distinct test/lint/typecheck/build command categories detected anywhere in CI workflows; language-agnostic, counted by category not by file."
        },
        {
          "name": "default_branch_ci_depth",
          "label": "PR-gate CI workflow count",
          "value": 6,
          "max": 4,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.55,
          "unit": "workflows",
          "description": "Counts CI workflows that target pull requests or the default branch, up to 4."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B4",
      "title": "Audit trail and report-up completeness",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 2.9,
      "status": "verified",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "kind": "audit_log",
          "label": "Audit or changelog artifact",
          "path": "CITATION.cff",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "943d40f1504ae64f0f61c9d76cd7fd5cd13d843f9e636fd2465b10107d56ea96"
        },
        {
          "kind": "audit_log",
          "label": "Audit or changelog artifact",
          "path": "HISTORY.md",
          "line": 1,
          "contentHash": "4ac933062dfd81f19de5e82250990dfda9dc402a8c6110ff868af13c90546425"
        }
      ],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "name": "audit_artifact_depth",
          "label": "Audit artifact depth",
          "value": 2,
          "max": 3,
          "kind": "saturating_count",
          "weight": 0.8,
          "unit": "files",
          "description": "Measures quantity of audit, security, runbook, incident, status, and changelog artifacts."
        },
        {
          "name": "audit_freshness_depth",
          "label": "Audit freshness depth",
          "value": 2,
          "max": 2,
          "weight": 0.2,
          "unit": "ratio",
          "description": "Credits audit artifacts that carry freshness/current-state markers."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "B5",
      "title": "Internal process dimension",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 0,
      "status": "not_applicable",
      "evidence": [],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [],
      "notes": "Substrate-specific: an internal process dimension is not applicable to external code."
    },
    {
      "id": "B6",
      "title": "Privileged-operation human gating",
      "category": "process_trust",
      "score": 0,
      "status": "not_applicable",
      "evidence": [],
      "findings": [],
      "metrics": [],
      "notes": "No privileged-operation surface (prod DB admin GRANT/privilege DDL, role escalation, or documented human-gate governance) detected in this repo."
    }
  ],
  "archetype": "source",
  "contentReadSummary": {
    "skipped": 74,
    "byReason": {
      "unreadable": 0,
      "tooLarge": 0,
      "excludedByExtension": 72,
      "deniedPath": 0,
      "nonRegularFile": 2
    },
    "unreadableByErrno": {},
    "affectedCriteria": []
  },
  "verdict": "conditional",
  "codeTrustScore": 2.9,
  "processTrustScore": 3.5,
  "overallScore": 3.2
}